Four Foundations for Elevating Employee Engagement

Did you know that when an employee leaves his job, 67% of the time it is not the job, it is the boss? Of course you know the importance of preventing your best employees from becoming someone else’s best talent, but how exactly do you do it? Here are four ways to build trust and earn their loyalty.

1. Face time is important. Personal contact is important as it creates an emotional connection with the organization. Whether you have an on-site or remote workforce, be sure to connect with them regularly. It’s more than offering an “open door policy” – get out of your office and walk. Pick up the phone and talk to your team. Connect with your team members the way they want to be contacted. Some people prefer texting, others email, while others still like to talk face-to-face. Personal contact is important. Follow a hint from the TV show “Undercover Boss” and put yourself in the shoes of your employees. Understand what they are faced with on a daily basis and they will be much more willing to do their best in their work.

two. Express your appreciation. Watch your employees doing things right. What is recognized is repeated, so let them know specifically what they are doing right. Organizations seem to be spending a ton of money on “stuff,” providing employees with numerous catalogs from which to choose any number of rewards. Although it is a nice gesture, it is not the award that creates an emotional connection. It is the sincere verbal expression or handwritten note of appreciation for a job well done that is treasured. A woman on one of my shows recently shared that the thank you notes she wrote to her staff members two years ago are still posted on their bulletin boards. Writing it down makes a difference. Handwritten notes are tangible evidence that employees can refer to whenever they need a lift.

3. Ask questions. Are you afraid to ask your employees what they want because they fear their “unreasonable demands”? Often times, what you’ll find is that it doesn’t take much to keep your team happy. Once your basic needs are met, small adjustments make a big difference. Asking your staff for suggestions and ideas can provide insight that you may not have considered. Inviting your staff members to share their opinion means a lot, acting on their suggestions seals the deal.

Four. Complaints welcome. Marshall Fields said: “Those who buy, support me. Those who come to compliment me, please me. Those who complain teach me how I can please others into buying. The only ones who hurt me are those who are disgusted but not complaining. They deny me permission to correct my mistakes and thus improve my service. ” This quote is as applicable to employees as it is to customers. Office confusion is not going to go away, however you can circumvent its negative consequences by making it safe for employees to express their opinions. When you know what is really going on within your organization, you can take the necessary steps to correct what needs to be fixed and not suffer long-term negative effects. Remember: if you are asking the question, be willing to be open to the answer, no matter what it is.

Using these four simple strategies not only increases employee engagement, loyalty, and retention, it also leads to the big three “Ps”: productivity, passion, and profit. The best part? Implementing these ideas won’t cost you an arm and a leg.


Champ Bailey Biography – His Early Years

One of the most respected defensive players in the NFL today would have to be Champ Bailey. He is often considered among the best (if not the best) NFL cornerbacks in the country. As a top cornerback in the NFL, he always puts in a solid effort and is known for his work ethic and leadership in the locker room. There are many things about this professional soccer player that people don’t know about. Since his youth, he has always shown potential as a top-level player and his brothers were by his side. Knowing a little about his upbringing could help you understand more about who he is and how he got to where he is now.

Biological Fields (cont.)

Boss, Champ and Ron

Many Broncos fans have heard of Champ and Boss, one of the few sibling combos that played for the Denver Broncos. The last time two brothers played on the same side of the ball for the Broncos was in ’92 with Doug and Dave Widell. The Bailey brothers’ story is similar to Manning’s story with Eli and Peyton. The Bailey brothers also include three members, although in both situations their older brother’s career was cut short due to injuries. Bailey’s older brother Ron was a 2-year starting cornerback at the University of Georgia (the same college that all the Bailey brothers played at). He also played for NFL Europe representing the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. Unfortunately, Ron’s career ended with a serious foot injury. Both Boss and Champ have credited Ron Bailey for their dedication and strong work ethic, Champ has explained multiple times how Ron’s guidance has been so influential in his own success, Ron set the tone for the rest of the family. Elaine Bailey (Mom) explained that Ron always talked about getting to the “next level,” whether it was in sports, education, or career, which she said inspired Champ and Boss to do it. The three brothers are highly respected in Folkston, Georgie, their hometown, of course for playing great football, but they were also considered good students. Boss and Champ visit their hometown frequently, sometimes hosting city-wide meals, sometimes during the holidays or other special events. To give you an idea of ​​Champs’ loyalty to home and family, when he put his name in the NFL draft, ESPN offered him a free plane ticket and a hotel in New York City, instead Champ chose go home and watch the NFL Draft with your family and hometown on television Another very close member of the family is Danielle Bailey, sister of Champs. Lives in Stockton, GA and hosts Bailey’s soccer camp. The parents of this distinguished group are Roland and Elaine Bailey, who are separated but still very close to their children and responsible for raising these fine individuals.

High school career

Champ Bailey attended Chalton County High, located in his hometown of Folkston, Georgia (a 3-traffic light city). He played soccer, basketball (no problem diving) and track (94 ‘Georgia high jump champion). While playing soccer, he showed immense potential on the field according to coaches and locals, playing quarterback and free safety. In his senior year, the coach moved him to running back and his quarterback was none other than his own brother Boss. Playing in the backfield on offense, Champ had more than 1,800 rushing yards and 28 touchdowns. Keep in mind; he achieved those stats during a 12-game season. Therefore, it is understandable that universities across the country wanted to add him to their own team. But, in the end, Bailey decided to go with her older brother Ron at the University of Georgia.


Republican Electoral Interference: History Lessons Series 2

American audiences love sequels. If you loved or hated the Mueller report, you will love or hate the aftermath of Congress when public impeachment hearings begin on November 13. Donald Trump seemed to get away with electoral interference “to his face” in 2016. Can he do it again in 2020? If so, will you be looking for a third or fourth sequel?

But there is more. Trump episodes are a rerun of the Nixon dramas of 1968 and 1972. President Johnson and senior officials around him knew that Nixon got away with foreign policy interference in 1968 and thus won the election through dirty tricks. international Although unknown at the time, the Watergate robbery was a sequel in national politics to Nixon’s successful interference in 1968.

Although the outcome of the unfolding impeachment drama remains uncertain, three historical lessons can be seen, although its outcomes cannot be predicted at this time. Contrary to what you hear, history does not repeat itself. But some themes and patterns repeat themselves, taking unexpected forms that pose new dangers and possibilities as in the case of these three lessons.

Lesson One: Parallelism. Nixon was caught during his second term for illegally meddling in an election he was sure to win. Had he gotten away with illegal meddling in the 1968 election as President Johnson sealed the evidence of concern for national security. Donald Trump meddled in the 2016 campaign in front of television cameras. The investigation of his actions was kept secret even when his opponent’s investigations affected the campaign. Trump damaged the effectiveness of the Mueller Report by attacking it for two years and then having his Attorney General undermine it when it was published. DESPITE the evidence that should have led to impeachment, it appeared that meddling during the 2016 campaign might not prevent Trump’s reelection.

The parallel with Nixon is clear after the Mueller Report. Needing even more help as Russia win re-election, Trump began gathering investigations into his most feared adversary in 2020 by using congressionally funded military aid to extort money from the President of Ukraine. This was not done on camera, but in the presence of seasoned diplomatic professionals who understood the dangers to our national security.

Seeming to have escaped meddling for a first term, Nixon HAD has also escaped, Trump was caught doing the same thing for a second term. The whistleblower complaint had the effect of a botched theft at Watergate. Both events brought to light events destined to happen in secret. The investigations then brought people with heavy consciences in front of cameras exposing presidential dishonesty to the world.

Lesson two: predictable versus unpredictable outcome. Political and scientific media commentators behave more like football announcers when they focus on political games to predict the outcome of this impeachment process. The outcome of Bill Clinton’s impeachment was clear when Senate Democrats backed him, agreeing with the majority of the American people that he had done wrong but should not have been charged. Nixon’s outcome, however, was not predictable. He was not charged or prosecuted because support collapsed to the point that he resigned instead of enduring the process. So if Trump’s impeachment fails, it will happen predictably when Senate Republicans follow Mitch McConnell and hold the line. If the impeachment is successful, you will most likely take a course that is not scheduled at this time and will demonstrate Nancy Pelosi’s ability to negotiate impossible situations.

This impeachment process hinges on the contest between Mitch McConnell and Nancy Pelosi. It is possibly the last battle in the war between them since the Affordable Care Act (ACA). McConnell kept the Republican line in the Senate when the ACA passed with a 60-vote Democratic majority. Soon after, Democrats lost one of those seats and it seemed certain that the House would never accept the Senate version. That’s when Pelosi did the impossible, proving herself as a closer when necessary – even when it meant losing the majority in the House. McConnell then used the ACA to defeat the Democrats during four consecutive legislative elections. However, the elimination of the ACA was only possible after the 2016 victory with Trump’s victory. It was then that public opinion changed as it is becoming clear that there was no Republican alternative to the benefits that millions of people would lose. Mitch McConnell appears to have the upper hand if impeachment moves to Senate trial. No one doubts that he intends to support the party rather than the country; He already committed to that choice in the 2016 election when he refused to support President Obama’s actions against Russian interference.

HOWEVER, Nancy Pelosi handles the process before it reaches the Senate. He has an impressive winning record when committing to fights and shouldn’t be underestimated. He has also shown his commitment to the country more than to the party. If its strategy leads to a successful Overthrow of Donald Trump, it will follow a path that almost certainly no one can predict when the public hearings begin.

Lesson three: Russia and China. Nixon meddled in two elections while we were in a war in Vietnam. Our enemy was North Vietnam, but I knew they were an indicator of China and Russia. Nixon was also extremely adept at redirecting national policies towards China and Russia so clearly promote world peace and not undermine our international alliances.

Any true disciple of Nixon Republicanism should be surprised that Nixon’s revenge team, Roger Ailes, Paul Manafort, and Roger Stone used Russian help to elect Donald Trump. Meddling in Ukraine Russia also helps other allies while demonstrating that you can not trust us.

Eisenhower, Nixon and Reagan would roll in their graves (if such a thing were possible) at the prospect of a single Republican president crawling into Russia, attacking our European allies, undermining South Korean confidence and Japan and send our farmers to recession through a trade war with China that has constantly undermined agricultural supply chains. These first-term accomplishments will be followed by greater catastrophes if the current electoral meddling brings a second Trump presidential term.

Conclution. Richard Nixon undermined peace efforts in Vietnam as part of his 1968 bid for the presidency. Lyndon Johnson withheld that fact from the public out of concern for national security. Nixon meddled in the 1972 election, was captured, and had to resign to escape impeachment. Three revenge-seeking Nixon supporters – Roger Ailes, Paul Manafort and Roger Stone – helped Donald Trump win the 2016 election with the support of Russia. Trump’s opponent was known to be under investigation by the FBI, but news of a more serious investigation into Trump was kept under wraps. The FBI investigation resulted in the work of Special Counsel, Robert Mueller, being successfully obstructed. Mueller’s results played by the rules in a way that seemed to reward obstruction. With the help of an obedient attorney general, it appeared that Trump had escaped. Then came news from a whistleblower, like the shocking news of the Watergate robbery. This prompted a number of professionals to speak the truth to Congress and sparked an impeachment investigation.

Like Nixon, Trump was caught with a smoking gun in his hand. Both escaped the assassination of the first half. Will Trump escape a second time?

The answer depends on the American people and Nancy Pelosi. The public is about to hear the truth. Will we recognize it and demand the removal of this president? If impeachment is successful, it will happen because of the vision and integrity of Nancy Pelosi and her team. And the outcome will be something none of us will be able to predict when the public hearings begin.

References on Nixon’s 1968 electoral interference:

Peter Baker, “Nixon Tried to Spoil Vietnam Peace Talks in ’68, Notes Show,” The New York Times (January 2, 2017), / politics /nixon-tried-to-spoil-johnsons-vietnam-peace-talks-in-68-notes-show.html.

John A. Farrell, “When a Candidate Conspired with a Foreign Power to Win an Election”, Revista Politico (August 6, 2017), nixon-vietnam-candidate-conspired-with-foreign-power-won-the-elections-215461.

Robert Johnson, “Did Nixon Commit Treason in 1968? What New LBJ Tapes Reveal”, History News Network,

Charles Wheeler, “The Lyndon Johnson Tapes: Richard Nixon’s ‘Betrayal’,” BBC News Magazine (March 22, 2013),


Jordan Melo M8 Cool Gray Basketball Shoes

There is a gray cloud hovering over the Big Apple. In reality, there is a gray cloud hovering over each and every city in the United States that has been blessed with an NBA franchise. The NBA lockout is still in full effect and the fact that pro basketball games are nowhere near happening is enough to put any fan down. But the cloud hovering over New York City is a different shade of gray than those hovering over other cities. This cloud is Cool Gray. And it represents the new Jordan Melo M8 colourway. A new colourway of Carmelo Anthony’s exclusive sneaker has been released and it sports the most popular color in the basketball shoe business.

The new Melo M8 colourway uses a lot of Cool Gray in its colourway. The upper, midsole and laces of the shoe have this epic color. White is used on the sole, the Melo branding and a part of the midsole. The black occupies a part of the heel cup and finishes off a very clean color combination of an already epic shoe. The color scheme is definitely sick, but what about the Melo M8’s performance design?

There is nothing to worry about, the performance design this shoe was built with is second to none. Nike Flywire is used in a full grain leather upper. Cushioning is enhanced by a Nike Phylon midsole complete with Zoom Air and Air Max units. This shoe provides the ultimate in impact protection. A solid rubber herringbone outsole finishes off the shoe and allows for superior traction control.

This new edition of the Melo M8 gives Carmelo another weapon in his unique sneaker arsenal. Playing alongside Amar’e Stoudemire for another season will undoubtedly provide more weaponry in the Knicks’ battle to win an NBA Finals Championship. Add Chauncy Billups and the Knicks have a legitimate shot at the title. That is, of course, if there is a title. If the lockout doesn’t end soon, there will be no war on any NBA hard court this season.

But there will be plenty of Melo exclusive sneakers to copy. This new colourway is one of many that have already been released. And it won’t be the last. The Melo M8 does not expect more money. That’s the great thing about Jordan basketball shoes. Their services are always available, regardless of the amount of money involved.


Private jets are not a luxury for NASCAR teams

Business travel can be routine, but for NASCAR drivers and racing teams who are on the road for 36 races a year, travel is unavoidable.

If these teams had to rely on commercial airline schedules, travel would be a nightmare, if not a logistical impossibility. That’s why most top-tier drivers own private jets, and race teams operate fleets of small planes to transport pit crew members and team executives to the racetrack each week.

Dale Earnhardt, Jr. owns a LearJet 60, which is the top of the LearJet line, and his largest aircraft. It is a business jet with capacity for 10 passengers.

Thanks to the jet, Earnhardt can leave his home in North Carolina and be at the Daytona or Texas racetrack a couple of hours later – about the time it would take to drive to a major airport and get through security.

NASCAR rookie and former Formula One driver Juan Pablo Montoya also owns a LearJet 60. 2006 champion Jimmie Johnson owns a Learjet 31A, and Jeff Gordon owns a British Aerospace Hawker 800.

Most drivers leave the flight to professional pilots, but Mark Martin is a licensed pilot who often flies his own Cessna Citation. Martin lives in a unique community near Daytona Beach called Spruce Creek. It is a fly in community with its own airport. Residents have airplane hangars in the yard where most of us have garages. Martin can literally park his jet in the garage.

Race crews operate larger aircraft to transport pit crews and team executives to the track. Roush Racing operates a fleet of aircraft, including a Boeing 737 and several smaller commercial jets. Dale Earnhardt ,, Inc. flies to his pit crew in an Embraer 120, a mid-size turboprop that seats 30 passengers.

While cars have vanity plates, NASCAR teams have vanity aircraft registration numbers. Dale Jr’s Learjet is N8JR and Jeff Gordon’s Hawker is N24JG. The Embraer company in Dale Earnhardt, Inc. is N500DE.

NASCAR has come to rely so heavily on private jet travel that many runways are located right next to airports. Daytona International Speedway is located right next to the Daytona Beach International Airport, where private jets and commercial flights arrive daily.

While most runways are not located that close to a major international airport, some runways have built their own airports. Right next to the Atlanta Motor Speedway is Tara Field, a small general aviation airstrip that sees little traffic until race week, when more than 600 planes descend on this tiny airfield.

However, some tracks aren’t that convenient, but when that happens, hope NASCAR drivers find a solution. When NASCAR descends on a track like Dover Delaware, some drivers like Dale Earnhardt avoid racing traffic by flying from the airport to the race track in a rented helicopter, landing directly in the frame.

Some people consider private air travel a luxury, but with today’s busy driver’s schedule, it’s a necessity. After a Sunday afternoon race, a driver can jump into his jet and be home on Sunday night. This means they can meet with team leaders and team owners on Monday morning to review the previous race and develop a strategy for the next one. During the week, drivers are often on the jet again, meeting with sponsors, filming TV commercials, making public appearances, and testing. Without a jet this schedule would be impossible. Most drivers agree that having a private jet gives them a day or two of productive time a week, or just allows them an occasional day off.

You can view images of these aircraft on and get more detailed information about each aircraft.


Dealing with the left hook of the counter

This is hard. Some guys are very good at countering with the left hook and moving their head and feet simultaneously. They take a step back and fade to safety and you are exposed as you fast-forward taking photos. Even with your hands up, you’ll lose your balance to the left if the guy has some ‘umph’ on his hooks.

The best ones are capable of throwing two and three counter left hooks in succession, and many guys with a good left counter will time it with their straight right hand, bring their left shoulder to their chin and block their shot and hit. you at the same time. This is a nifty move that guys used to do with me all the time. I was able to add it to my own game as it got better.

Think about the left hook for a second, what is open when your opponent throws it? Well, the entire left side of his body is open. The upper left part of his head is open and technically his chin and the entire center of his face are open in half. For the most part, you’re going to nail this guy with your right hand, but at the same time that’s exactly what he expects you to throw, so this is where the chess game begins.

The left hook counter is a very safe counter when moving backwards. Especially for the taller outside fighter who fights back with the left hook when you’re pitching. I found three good general techniques for launching an attack against a guy who has a fascination for the left counter, the key is timing and timing. I will explain each of them below.

1) Quick Jab and Powerful Right Hand to the Body – Here you are trying to get your opponent to commit to a left hook by initiating the attack with a jab. You throw a quick jab, it doesn’t matter if he lands, the key is to finish your jab before the left hook ends and drop the levels to throw the right hand to his open body, a fake jab works great, you are trying to serve your opponent. A psychological tactic in boxing is to make your opponent think that a technique will work for you and then try to get him to throw that technique, and then you respond with the natural counter. If you understand the rhythm in boxing, you know that stepping in to throw a full jab gives your opponent plenty of time to land with a left hook. So you’re going to throw a quick jab / false jab while stepping with your left foot and then follow it with a big right hand when your back foot catches up with it, it’s the classic one-two combo. If he’s not going for your bait and just blocking, then GOOD, just stick with the left hook and other punches and get out when you’re done, or stay inside if you’re a good inside fighter. If he swings the left hook and you have landed well, then your right hand will land, then you will step to the right at an angle and begin a second attack. All of this interaction should take about a second or less.

2) Quick / False Jab, Slide Head Left, Left Hook, Then Straight Right Hand – Similar to the first tactic, you want your opponent to throw the left hook, he loves it and thinks he’s good to it, like this Let him think that it is to go to work and take it off. In this combo you only hope to land the straight on the right, the rest of the punches are just a preparation, this is the beauty of good boxing, the shot you intend to land is on the road and out of sight, but you already know exactly what What are you doing. So you throw a quick jab to lure him into his hook, slide to the left and then come back to him with a big left hook and then ** bamn ** the right straight. When you slide to the left, his left hook should brush against you or even make contact, but since you are sliding in the same direction as the blow, it will have little effect.

3) Double jab and straight right: This is not your typical double jab and straight right, you are going to shoot down and through him and aim your jab at his chest on the left side, it is not as smart as your classic double jab. and right hand where you stand. Instead, you’re going to go down a bit, sink your chin deep into your chest, raise your hands higher, almost like you’re going to dive headfirst into this guy. You want to be more protected because your goal is to get his left hook out of the right glove and then throw your right right after he feels it. When you come in with this you’re trying to be solid like a train on tracks, you want to jab his left shoulder or the left side of his chest, this will open him up a bit for when you throw your right hand. He will throw his left hook and probably two or three. After your double jabs connect with your chest / shoulder, you will launch that right hand to the center. Basically, you’ll walk through the fire from his left hook in a compact stance and throw his right hand after his left hook is gone.

These three tactics will allow you to deal with the counter left hook at all times.


When will college football have a playoff?

The only question now that most soccer fans have in mind is: will there actually be a tiebreaker? Some of them may consider it a dream, especially the BCS opponents. Currently, the BCS has a television contract until 2013. And the BCS does not feel pressure to change before or after that date.

Today, the great schools have no incentive to share the wealth they generate from the great bowls. Conferences like the SEC treat their season as a tiebreaker as the national champion has come out of that conference for the past three years, and five times in the BCS’s eleven-year history. But most of the theoretical playoff formats include the champion from each BCS conference. So why would minor conferences like Big East, Big Ten, and Pac 10 participate in a tiebreaker?

Although it appears that a tiebreaker would create more wealth to distribute among all, the presidents of the universities have very different ideas about how to distribute the money. Admittedly, a tiebreaker would likely produce more than the $ 17.5 million payment to the SEC and Big 12 on behalf of Florida and Oklahoma for the 2009 National Championship game. However, even though the pie would grow, there would be many more teams trying to grab a piece. A playoff would allow four, eight, or, according to some plans, sixteen teams to play for the national championship. That would create a lot more teams looking for a cut.

Teams like Utah, Boise State and other schools that have had undefeated records in recent years believe they should have had a chance to play for the national championship. The Utah attorney general went so far to file an antitrust lawsuit against the BCS for refusing to allow the Utes a chance to play for the championship.

On the other hand, these big state schools in the SEC, Big 12, plus some others like USC and Ohio State, invest so much money in their sports and have created programs; They don’t think they should get hit by a new “BCS Buster” every year. Utah head coach Kyle Wittingham is the 80th highest paid coach in college football. That’s lower than all SEC schools, including lowly Vanderbilt and Kentucky. Teams like Florida and LSU pay their coaches the most and are also, perhaps coincidentally, at the top of the rankings every year. Its presidents believe that their commitment to producing a world-class soccer team should be rewarded.

It seems certain that the BCS will have to fulfill its television contract until 2013. After that, however, college presidents and the NCAA may no longer be responsible for the future of their sport. Since President Obama announced that he was a supporter of a playoff, the issue has gained some traction in Congress. According to ESPN, Utah Attorney General Mark Shurtleff is expected to file his antitrust lawsuit in June 2009. If the BCS is found guilty of antitrust violations, it would be forced to create a new “open and inclusive system” – a tiebreaker.


Bear Down Chicago Bears Ringtone

The Bear Down Chicago Bears ringtone is one that Chicago fans know quite well. This is a very popular tune that is played when the Chicago Bears play at home. The song plays throughout the stadium (Soldier Field) every time the Bears score a field goal or touchdown. Also, if they score any points, either on special teams or on a defensive comeback for a touchdown, the song “Bear Down” plays.

The Chicago Bears play all of their home games at Soldier Field and while this song plays throughout the stadium after scoring, they also have a couple of people running through the end zones with a big Bears flag. It’s a great scene to watch if you’re a Bears fan as the whole crowd can easily sing along to the Bear Down Chicago Bears ringtone. Whether it’s 70 degrees or even below freezing during some of the frigid games towards the end of the year, the crowd has no trouble getting every word right during the song.

Chicago is off to a good start this year when they beat the Indianapolis Colts in their first road game. The Colts are usually a pretty good team, so the Bears got a nice win against them, but then lost their next two games to put them on a 1-2 record this year. With pinch running back Matt Forte and his defensive unit healthy this year, the Chicago Bears can make a playoff run as they and the Green Bay Packers are supposed to be battling for the division title.


Third World America by Arianna Huffington, Current Book: America’s Middle Class Economic Crisis.

Arianna Huffington, founder and editor-in-chief of The Huffington Post, the sixth most popular online news source, details the state of the country’s middle class. His new book is titled “Third World America: How Our Politicians Are Leaving the Middle Class and Betraying the American Dream.” Read your perspective and see if you agree.

Third world america It is presented in five sections, where Chapter One echoes the title of the book. It’s packed with stories and statistics highlighting the decline of the American middle class. How do you define “middle class”? Turn to self-definition, Huffington says. “If you consider yourself middle class, is it so middle class. “

The nation’s fading industrial base, the erosion of the educational system, and the decaying infrastructure all contribute to the decline; as is high unemployment, where one in six Americans is unemployed or underemployed. Meet Dean B., who, at age 35, was fired from his IT job in February 2009 and is still unemployed. Kimberly B. sold her wedding ring on Craigslist to pay her family’s utility bills.

Huffington further explores the plight of the middle class, citing fear as a predominant emotion. Destroyed 401 (k) s, dwindling pensions, prolific foreclosures, and signs of a future Social Security collapse; feed the anxieties. Reaching the middle class is now believed by many to be a lucky draw, not unlike a prize on a scratch off lottery ticket.

America’s infrastructure is crumbling, Huffington says, with insufficient state and federal funding. Roads, electrical networks, waterways, railways and bridges are some of the victims. Some water pipes, originally laid during the Civil War, are working dangerously.

Think of August 2007, when the Interstate 35W steel truss bridge collapsed over the Mississippi River in downtown Minneapolis; killing 13 people and wounding 145. Previous patchwork repairs were insufficient.

The nation’s school system is anemic, with the United States ranking 25th in mathematics and 21st in science among 30 developed countries; according to the classification of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. In 2009, the United States broadband connection ranked 15th among industrialized countries.

The decline of the middle class in America has been brewing for decades. In the late 1980s, technology, outsourcing, and the loss of manufacturing jobs started a middle-class economy with stagnant wages.

The election of Ronald Regan saw the proliferation of free-market beliefs: less government intervention could better determine society’s winners and losers. Regan also ushered in the era of the great divide between rich Americans and the middle class; which continues today.

Huffington says that an unregulated free market is corrupted sooner or later by fraud and excess. Witness the bank bailouts and the Wall Street debacle of 2008.

American politics is broken, as powerful lobbyists and American corporations rule Washington. In 2010, three examples of regulatory failures due to corporate cuddles were the explosion at the Upper Branch mine in West Virginia; the BP oil explosion in the Gulf of Mexico; and the ongoing aftermath of the financial collapse, including fraud charges against Goldman Sachs. The voice of the middle class is nothing more than an echo in the Capitol chambers.

Huffington writes animated analogies to make his points. When he speaks of influential lobbyists, he says: “And like a swarm of termites reducing a house to sawdust, wealthy interests and their lobbyists are building on the foundations of our democracy.”

Each chapter concludes with a profile of a once successful middle-class American who is now struggling financially. Their stories offer gems of 21st century vision, such as “Stability is long gone, so you better be doing something you love!”

Third World America The title is extreme, Huffington admits, used to emphasize the possible future of our nation, without serious reform. He optimistically concludes that our descent into a Third World nation “is not a done deal.”

Americans are known for being positive, forward thinking, and positive people. Stopping the descent into a Third World nation will not be easy. You will take bold initiatives from the public and private sectors and personal responsibility. Now, more than ever, we must extract the most underused leadership resource available to us: ourselves. We will still need the raw energy that only big governments and appropriations can provide.

Ultimately, change happens at the local and personal level. Today it is up to us to help each other and ourselves. She advocates breaking out of her big bank. Executives accepted the government bailout, paid themselves record bonuses; however, they do not sympathize with Americans facing foreclosure. Instead, work with community banks and credit unions. The greatest antidote to despair is action; and resilience is key to surviving and thriving in the 21st century.

Huffington reflects the message of Robert B. Reich, stated in his concurrently published book, Replica: The nextEconomy and future of the United States. Reich, a former Labor Secretary in the Clinton administration, also backs Third World America.

A book, presents a single voice. Although some will argue Huffington’s perspective, Third world america It is a reading that invites reflection on the present and future state of the nation.

To stay up-to-date on Huffington’s American Third World point of view, visit


The Unexpected Legacy of Divorce – Judith Wallerstein

This wonderfully researched book examines the lives of divorced children over a 25-year period. It shows that the challenges for divorced families, especially children, are complex and continue to transform society. It is stated that Four. Five% first marriages break up, that the risk of divorce in second marriages is 60%, cast 25% of today’s people between the ages 18-44 years have divorced parents.

The difficulty of writing this article is that only a few comments can be made on a book and a topic, the full consideration of which would take us very far. The first paragraph of the introductory chapter recounts a Sesame Street episode in which Kermit the frog interview a little bird asking where he lived. The bird’s response is that it spends half its time happily playing in its mother’s nest and the rest of its time frolicking in its father’s nest.

This little story illustrates one of the many assumptions that this book completely dispels. Many parents and policy makers assume that as soon as the marriage is dissolved and the parents are released from an unhappy union, their children’s lives will be exactly as before. This book destroys this notion and clearly shows the lasting effects of divorce on children, and how it later shapes and even ruins their lives.

The book represents the voices of these children. Now they have grown up and some have families of their own. They narrate their difficulties in dealing with loneliness, anger, depression, drug abuse, and even violence in their own lives that followed the breakdown of their families. They talk about the unpleasantness of jumping from nest to nest, often having few options for how to spend their time and feeling inferior to children from intact families. Now they are forcing society to pay more attention to their interests.

The book is written in five parts, like five stories, and each section demonstrates the unique challenges these children face. Part One it’s about Karen james, a child forced by divorce to be a caregiver early in her life and continued to put the needs of others above herself throughout her growing years. Your life is compared to Gary, a son of parents who decided to stay together despite their difficult marriage.

Karen’s father was a successful dermatologist and her mother worked in a flower shop. She regularly yelled at her husband for not paying enough attention to the family. He also yelled complaints at her. The situation worsened when Ms. James lost her mother in an accident. Her husband became the main target of her anger, as Ms. James quickly sank into depression. Eventually and inevitably, their marriage ended in divorce, as they continued their wild feud with their children watching.

With her father meeting and marrying someone else, Karen’s mother moved from one relationship to another. Karen, from a very young age, became a surrogate mother for her siblings and even her mother. His own childhood had ended early. He continued this habit of nurturing others in his personal relationships: he always felt responsible for the problems of others.

His story is juxtaposed to that of Gary, He grew up in a home where the parents weren’t happy with each other, but they got over it despite their difficulties. Gary He grew up, married, and had his own family. His parents had been a model to him of how to keep the family together, despite their unhappiness with each other.

The second part deals with Larry, a child raised in a family ruined by the domestic violence and rage that plagued his life after the breakdown of his parents’ divorce. It is compared to Carol, a young man who, like him, witnessed scenes of parental violence without them being separated.

The third part is about Paula, who suffered intense loneliness after the divorce when her mother started studying and continued working at the same time. The divorce brought with it a financial nightmare for both his parents and his mother to make ends meet and had to study and work at the same time. This not only caused the loss of structure in Paula’s life but also the constant presence of one of her parents. She was an orphan of father and mother.

The fourth part is about Billy, a vulnerable child with special medical needs because he was born with a congenital heart disease. Billy’s health made it difficult for him to adjust to the new family environment. Her mother quickly remarried and focused on her new family. His father was concerned about sports and his business. Neither seemed sensitive to the time and attention Billy needed.

The fifth part is about Lisa, who grew up in a family in which everything possible was done to ensure harmony. After the divorce, his parents were determined not to make their son’s suffering worse and often cooperated with each other. Lisa’s case leads to the question: Isn’t fighting enough? Does the absence of conflict between divorced parents protect the child from suffering? However, even this did not stop Lisa’s anger, even though she seemed to have adjusted better than others after her parents’ divorce.

Although her father apparently happily remarried, there was a greater distance between Lisa and her parents than when their family was intact. He had to adjust to the two families, while continuing to jump from one parent to the other. As she went from being a girl to a woman in her thirties, she still harbored fears about marriage.

His life mirrored that of many children of divorcees (40% of them) who decide to remain single as adults. Some of them, like Lisa, lived together, others jumped from one adventure to another, and some led very lonely lives. Lisa’s story illustrates that although children feel immediately the impact of divorce, it is in adulthood that they suffer the most – especially when they venture out in search of love.

The book is an eloquent account of the aftermath of divorce and seeks to make us understand the long-term impact on children. The authors caution us that although we have created a world where there is greater freedom for adults, this comes with considerable and hidden costs. The authors wisely point out that their book is not a pronouncement against divorce. They are aware of the acute suffering of adults trapped in failed marriages. They are also equally aware that very few adults make the decision to divorce without due consideration.

But they just want to point out that while divorce can be beneficial for parents, the consequences for children are often dire. This book also seeks to help those affected by divorce rebuild their lives. This book is also for policy makers – judges and a wide variety of stakeholders in the legal system – urging them to pay more attention to children’s interests during and after a divorce.

The authors wisely conclude that while post-divorce culture needs to be improved, much more effort should be put into strengthening the institution of marriage.