Gaming

RIVER EVIL – Jenny Milchman

admin

For years there has been a resurgence in the world of mystery / suspense that I call the Norse Invasion Noir. That movement has been spearheaded by fabulous writers like Stieg Larsson, Jo Nesbo, Camilla Lackberg, etc. Meanwhile in America, there has been a lesser known but just as powerful new subgenre in the mystery / suspense world I am referring to. like Adirondack Black.

The Adirondack Mountains of upstate New York are majestic, mysterious, beautiful, and full of history and stories. Various authors have set their stories in this area, which can be as stark and bleak as novels based on the Nordic region of Europe. One of the authors at the forefront of the Adirondack Noir movement is Jenny Milchman. He lives in the beautiful Hudson Valley region of New York, just north of New York, and has set his novels a little further north in the Adirondacks.

WICKED RIVER is Milchman’s best work to date — and that’s saying something! It is a dark and complex fever dream of a novel from which you cannot wake up or wake up. There is an air of mystery around the entire novel and the characters are so complicated that it is difficult to get a good handle on exactly what is happening or what drives them. Better to just sit back and go on your way.

The action begins with the wedding of Natalie and Doug Larson. They are a wealthy couple from New York who have chosen the Adirondacks not only for their wedding ceremony, but also for their honeymoon. Just before the wedding, Doug and two members of his bridal party are seen having a heated argument with two strangers who apparently came out of nowhere to confront them. This is witnessed not only by Natalie but also by her niece, Mia. Throughout the novel, Milchman switches between Doug, Natalie, and Mia for different points of view. This verbal altercation is strange but significant enough for the plot and the horrors to come.

After the ceremony, Doug and Natalie begin their honeymoon in the middle of the six million acre park that makes up the Adirondack Range. They have chosen to start their new life together in an adventurous way by going on an ‘off-road’ adventure that will include canoeing, camping, and foraging for food for themselves in the open nature. There are checkpoints to do or go to in case of trouble. What happens next is completely unexpected (and I won’t reveal everything here so as not to spoil it for other readers). Let Doug and Natalie get very disoriented and injured. They are not alone either. WICKED RIVER began with a scene showing a hiker being kidnapped by a strange figure. It is this same figure, who we later learn is called Kurt, that meets Doug and Natalie. At first, it appears that Kurt is their savior, as he helps care for both of them to health and provides them with food and shelter.

However, Kurt is the Adirondack version of the bogeyman. A man who has been living off the grid for so long that he has lost almost any semblance of humanity and is beyond dangerous. Kurt has created his own little world in which only he can decide who lives or dies in it. He becomes obsessed with those who are not marked for death, and there may be no way to escape. Now, he has turned his attention to Doug and Natalie. Any strange feelings that had already started in the young relationship between the newlyweds are quickly put aside as they will need all their wits to get over Kurt. It’s kind of like DELIVERANCE meets HUNGER GAMES as there are many traps in Kurt’s Adirondack Kingdom and he is the only master of games.

Doug and Natalie realize pretty quickly that Kurt is an unstable figure that they need to get away from. They know this long before they realize that the jerky they are eating is NOT venison. There’s a scene where they come across Kurt’s “smokehouse” that came straight out of the TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE. The novel comes with a reader question guide, as well as an engaging question and answer session with Jenny Milchman. What I found funniest is that she doesn’t consider herself a thriller writer. She’s right, because WICKED RIVER is so well written and filled with great characters and surprising plot twists that only a skilled writer could have created it, so labeling her a suspense writer seems to diminish this achievement. WICKED RIVER is an incredible and difficult to describe novel that borders on literary horror and will definitely haunt your dreams and serve as a warning to anyone seeking the adventure of an off-road visit to the Adirondacks.

Health Fitness

Carb Blocker Diet Pills: Do Phase 2 Carb Blockers Help You Lose Weight?

admin

A Carb Blocker is a special type of diet pill that interferes with the digestion of carbohydrates. Phase 2 is a particular type of carb blocker that is popular for these types of diet pills, such as Dietrine. The weight loss principle behind the Phase 2 Carb Blocker diet pill is that a certain portion of carbohydrates that you eat will not be digested, resulting in fewer calories and more stable blood glucose levels, which will help someone lose weight. faster and easier.

Carb Blockers = Mystery Magic Pills?

Carb Blocker Diet Pills are not magic pills that will eliminate all carbohydrates from your diet, but where they can be particularly helpful is turning “bad carbohydrates” into “good carbohydrates” (or better carbohydrates). This does not mean that you can eat all the sweets, bread, and pasta you want without consequences, but it does mean that you may have more options by following a low-carb or “good carb” diet.

Low carb / good carb diet

Carbohydrates, short for carbohydrates, have been of particular importance in diet plans in recent years. The Atkins diet was one of the first to endorse the low-carb approach, and others have followed suit. However, more commonly, many of these diets, such as the South Beach Diet, Nutrisystems, and others, are actually geared more toward “good carbs” rather than necessarily the low-carb approach advocated by Atkins.

Good carbs

“Good carbohydrates” are foods in which carbohydrates do not turn into blood sugar too quickly. This is good because spikes in blood sugar levels will cause the body to convert excess sugar into fat. Consistent blood sugar levels will also help keep energy levels high and control appetite, among other benefits. The glycemic index is a measure of how quickly this conversion to blood sugar occurs, and sometimes diet plans will speak of “glycemic advantage” and other similar terms.

Carb Blockers = Good Carbs

What carb-blocking supplements can do for you is help you turn bad carbs into better carbs. By inhibiting and slowing down the digestion of carbohydrates, these supplements help turn what might normally be a not-so-good choice of carbohydrates into something that is better suited to your diet. Basically, this is how low-glycemic foods work: There is something about food that inhibits the digestion of carbohydrates. Often the mechanism that works is fiber; fiber coats the carbohydrate material and digestive enzymes take longer to do their job. There are other mechanisms that work too, and these pills use one of these other approaches.

Phase 2

Phase 2 is concentrated white bean extract. It is safe and completely natural. What it does is, instead of coating carbohydrates with fiber to block digestive enzymes, as is often the case in low-glycemic foods, it neutralizes the chemicals of digestion before they have a chance to digest the carbohydrates. It is a somewhat similar principle to antacid; you neutralize the key fluids of digestion. Again, Phase 2 is not a magic pill that totally neutralizes all sugar digestion, but slows it down.

Carb Blocker Advantage

The advantage of these types of diet pills is that there is no need to search (and pay more) for a low-carb version of a particular food, and low-carb versions may often not be found. You are also more likely to follow a low-glycemic diet plan because it can include more variety and be less strict. You might really want some mashed potatoes, and with these supplements you’re really not cheating. You also don’t have to worry about things like whether or not you should buy whole wheat pasta or if you should buy the high-priced version that has less “net carbs.”

This dietary aid can be especially helpful in a multitude of situations:

  • Dining out in restaurants
  • Christmas dinners
  • Occasional cravings
  • Doing what is necessary is available around the house instead of special shopping
  • Buy cheaper instead of special diet versions
  • More selection overall while sticking to the diet.

Conclution

Carb Blocker Diet Pills with Phase 2 can be a great addition to a good or low carb diet plan. Phase 2 carb-blocking supplements inhibit carbohydrate digestion and transform many food options into the low-carb or good-carb variety. A key advantage of the Phase 2 Carb Blocker diet pill is that it is easier to maintain a low carb diet while using this supplement because it opens up more variety without having to specifically buy the low carb version of a particular food.

Legal Law

Hooray for the Federal Rules of Evidence!

admin

The Federal Rules of Evidence used in the federal courts of the United States and adopted by many states and the military are the codification of many years of common law rules of evidence. The development of modern rules of evidence has been a process of nothing more than putting old wine into new bottles. If one can understand common law notions of evidence, the Federal Rules will be easy to understand.

The purpose of the Federal Rules of Evidence is to ensure fairness in the administration of trials; eliminate unjustifiable expenses and delays; and promote the growth and development of the evidentiary law so that the truth is ascertained and the process is determined with justice. As a former trial attorney and current law school professor teaching the rules of evidence to students, I view the Federal Rules of Evidence, adopted by Congress in 1975, as a masterpiece of putting the old common law wine into a new bottle. I have used the Federal Rules of Evidence throughout my career.

This article is not about any specific common law rules or rules that may have been included in the new bottle known as the Federal Rule of Evidence. Instead, I write this to show how influential and widespread the use of the rules has been. Forty-four states, Guam, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, and the military have adopted all or part of the Federal Rules for use in their judicial systems. This is a very good trend because the rules of evidence for most states will be roughly the same throughout the United States.

The following paragraphs provide essential information about jurisdictions that have adopted rules of evidence based on Federal Rules. They include information on when the local rules went into effect and when they were amended, if at all:

ALABAMA. Adopted by the Alabama Supreme Court effective January 1, 1996. No amendment.

ALASKA. Adopted by the Alaska Supreme Court as of August 1, 1979. Last modified October 15, 2003.

ARIZONA. Adopted by the Arizona Supreme Court as of September 1, 1977. Last modified June 1, 2004.

ARKANSAS. Adopted by the Arkansas Supreme Court effective October 13, 1986. Last amended January 22, 1998.

COLORADO. Adopted by the Colorado Supreme Court effective January 1, 1980. Last amended July 1, 2002.

CONNECTICUT. Adopted by the Connecticut Superior Court judges effective January 1, 2000. No amendment.

DELAWARE. Adopted by the Delaware Supreme Court effective February 1, 1980. Last amended December 10, 2001.

FLORIDA. The Florida Code of Evidence was enacted by the Florida Legislature effective July 1, 1979. Last amended July 1, 2003.

GEORGIA. Governor Nathan Deal signed a House bill that made Georgia’s rules effective on January 1, 2013. No amendments.

GUAM. Adopted by the Guam Judicial Council as of November 16, 1979. Last amended July 18, 2003.

HAWAII. Enacted by the Hawaii Legislature effective January 1, 1981. No amendment.

IDAHO. Adopted by the Idaho Supreme Court as of July 1, 1985. No amendment.

ILLINOIS. Adopted by the Illinois Supreme Court effective January 1, 2011. No amendment.

INDIANA. Adopted by the Indiana Supreme Court effective January 1, 1994. Last amended January 1, 2004.

IOWA. Adopted by the Iowa Supreme Court effective July 1, 1983. Last amended February 15, 2002.

KENTUCKY. Enacted by the Kentucky Legislature effective July 1, 1992. Last amended July 1, 2003.

LOUISIANA. Enacted by the Louisiana Legislature effective January 1, 1989. Last amended August 15, 2003.

MAINE. Adopted by the Supreme Judicial Court of Maine as of February 2, 1976. Last amended July 1, 2002.

MARYLAND. Adopted by the Maryland Court of Appeals effective July 1, 1994. Last amended January 1, 2004.

MICHIGAN. Adopted by the Michigan Supreme Court effective March 1, 1978. Last amended January 1, 2004.

MINNESOTA. Adopted by the Minnesota Supreme Court as of April 1, 1977. Last amended January 1, 1990.

MISSISSIPPI. Adopted by the Mississippi Supreme Court effective January 1, 1986. Last amended May 27, 2004.

MOUNTAIN. Adopted by the Montana Supreme Court effective July 1, 1977. Last amended October 18, 1990.

NEBRASKA. Enacted by the Nebraska Legislature effective December 31, 1975. Last amended July 13, 2000.

NEVADA. Enacted by the Nevada Legislature effective July 1, 2004. No amendment.

N.H. Adopted by the New Hampshire Supreme Court effective July 1, 1985. Last amended January 1, 2003.

NEW JERSEY. Adopted by the New Jersey Supreme Court and the New Jersey Legislature in a joint proceeding beginning July 1, 1993. Last amended July 1, 1993.

NEW MEXICO. Adopted by the New Mexico Supreme Court as of July 1, 1973. The last amendment went into effect on February 1, 2003.

NORTH CAROLINA. Enacted by the North Carolina Legislature effective July 1, 1984. Last amended October 1, 2003.

NORTH DAKOTA. Adopted by the Supreme Court of North Dakota as of February 15, 1977. Last amended March 1, 2001.

OHIO. Adopted by the Ohio Supreme Court as of July 1, 1980. Last amended July 1, 2003.

OKLAHOMA. Enacted by the Oklahoma Legislature effective October 1, 1978. Last amended November 1, 2003.

OREGON. Enacted by the Oregon Legislature effective January 1, 1982. Last amended July 3, 2003.

PENNSYLVANIA. Adopted by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court effective October 1, 1998. Last amended January 1, 2002.

PUERTO RICO. Promulgated by the Legislature of Puerto Rico as of October 1, 1979. Last amended on August 30, 1999.

RHODE ISLAND. Adopted by the Rhode Island Supreme Court effective October 1, 1987. No amendment.

SOUTH CAROLINA. Enacted by the South Carolina Legislature effective September 3, 1995. No amendment.

SOUTH DAKOTA. Enacted by the South Dakota Legislature effective July 1, 1978. No amendment.

TENNESSEE. Adopted by the Tennessee Supreme Court effective January 1, 1990. Last amended July 1, 2003.

TEXAS. Adopted by the Texas Supreme Court effective March 1, 1998. No amendment.

UTAH. Adopted by the Utah Supreme Court effective September 1, 1983. Last amended November 1, 2004.

VERMONT. Adopted by the Vermont Supreme Court effective April 1, 1983. Last amended May 27, 2003.

WASHINGTON. Adopted by the Washington Supreme Court on April 2, 1979. Last amended on September 1, 2003.

WEST VIRGINIA. Adopted by the West Virginia Supreme Court effective February 1, 1985. Last amended January 1, 1995.

WISCONSIN. Adopted by the Wisconsin Supreme Court effective January 1, 1974. Last amended March 30, 2004.

WYOMING. Adopted by the Wyoming Supreme Court effective January 1, 1978. Last amended February 28, 1995.

THE MILITARY. The Military Rules of Evidence were adopted by Decree No. 12,198 of March 12, 1980. Last modified by Executive Decree No. 13,262 of April 11, 2002.

THE COMMUNITY OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS. No date of adoption was found.

THE US VIRGIN ISLANDS. No date of adoption was found.

What an impressive list of adoptions and enactments modeled after the Federal Rules of Evidence! Several jurisdictions have not adopted rules of evidence based on the Federal Rules of Evidence. They are: California, the District of Columbia, Kansas, Massachusetts, Missouri, New York and Virginia.